I don't so many videos anymore with Professor Jim Al-Kalili, and I miss them so much, I really enjoy he's tempo and how simple he will explain very interesting matter of science, enjoyed every single episode.

Wake up, Gauss to Bessel Goettingen 9 April 1830 … The ease with which you delved into my views on geometry gives me real joy, given that so few have an open mind for such. My innermost conviction is that the study of space is a priori completely different than the study of magnitudes; our knowledge of the former (space) is missing that complete conviction of necessity (thus of absolute truth) that is characteristic of the latter; we must in humility admit that if number is merely a product of our mind.

Hello Professor Al-Kalili. I believe that gravity is a force of both attraction and repulsion, and is electromagnetic. The cornerstone of my hypothesis is the existance of two exceptionally small monopole particles. One is a negatively charged monopole particle called a ' Harveytron ', and a corresponding positively charged monople particle called a ' Dannytron '. In combination, they form all of the nuclei in the universe, and constitutes the attractive force of gravity. Alone, the negatively charged particles forms a cloud filling every available space throughout the universe. These negatively charged particles form the ' Dark Matter ', and the negative force that is produced is the ' Dark Energy ', and is the negative force of repulsion of gravity. I am happy to make a copy of my latest draft of my hypothesis available to you if you are interested. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

Belief isn’t truth.

@Islayman Hello, thank you for your reply. all I say is ' Prove me wrong '. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

@Tony Marsh Thats the problem with you kids these days. People who make positive claims have the burden of proof. Not me,

@Islayman Hello, thank you for your reply. It is great to still be thought of as a ' Kid ', thank you!. I am infact a 73 year old inventor, with patents granted in various fields. I have a background in both mechanical and electrical engineering, and 11years as a thechnical testing engineer, therefore well equiped to solve problems logically. If you are a physicist, I would be suprised if you were happy with the standard model of particle physics and cosmology, as even now, after over 100 years, it doesn't work. It sill can't explain ' Dark Matter ', ' Dark Energy ', or ' Gravity '. My model can give a logical explanation for these, also an alternative to the ' Big Bang ', ' Cosmic Inflation ' ' The cosmic Microwave Background Radiation ' and ' Red Shift '. I am happy answer any points you wish to raise. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

So this is a proof that Einstein’s gravity is wrong and Newton’s gravity is correct.